Town of
(Minor Development = Subdivision of four or fewer lots/one use on each
lot/ adjoining a public street)
(dates are based on 2006 calendar year;
based on code in effect 7/2006)
|
TASK/ACTION: |
DATE: |
TIME PERMITTED or
REQUIRED: |
TASK BEGIN DATE: |
TASK END DATE: |
CUMULATIVE DAYS
FROM SUBMITTAL: |
|
1. Applicant Meets with Planning Commission to verify Minor Development |
6/6 |
(prior notice to PC needed.) |
|
|
(application not yet
submitted; initial meeting with PC required.) |
|
2. Applicant Submits Minor Development Final Plat |
6/20 |
(assumes submittal is made
2-weeks after meeting with Planning Commission.) |
|
6/20 (submitted) |
14 days into ‘process’, application submitted. |
|
3. Staff Reviews Packet for Completeness |
6/21 to 7/11 |
20-working days |
6/21 |
7/11 (note |
35 |
|
4. Once Determined Complete, Applicant Submits indicated Number of Copies.
|
7/11 (notified) 7/17 (delivered to Town Hall.) |
Assumes 3-working days to
compile copies |
7/11 (applicant notified of #
copies needed) |
7/17 (copies submitted) |
41 |
|
5. Applicant Sent to Referral Agencies |
7/18 |
|
7/19 (day 1 of 25 days;
application sent by town staff) |
7/19 |
42 |
(continued)
|
6. Comments Back from Referral Agencies |
8/14 |
25-days |
7/19 (day 1 of 25) |
8/14 (day 25 of 25) |
69 |
||
|
7. Public Works Department Accepts all Final Engineering Plans |
8/14 |
Assumes applicant provides
final Engineering Plans prior to
8/14 (e.g. 9/23) |
Up to applicant regarding
submittal of final engineering plans.
Sooner is better preference. |
by 7/18(?) |
69 (final plans
accepted/approved by Public Works & Town Engineer) |
||
|
8. Planning Commission Public Hearing Notice sent to Newspaper. |
fax by 8/11 |
Publication 15-days prior
to hearing |
Published in paper on 8/17 |
Published in paper on 8/17 |
72 |
||
|
9. Planning Commission Public Hearing Notice to Property Owners within 500’ and on-property (responsibility of applicant except Staff prepares documents.) |
mail by 8/18 |
Notice 15-days prior to hearing. |
Mail by 8/18 |
Mail by 8/18 |
73 |
||
|
10. Planning Commission Public Hearing
|
9/5 |
|
9/5 |
9/5 |
91 |
||
|
11. Planning Commission Deliberation & written Recommendation to Board of Trustees. |
9/19 |
Typically not realistic for
PC to make a recommendation on night of hearing; body needs time to
deliberate on public hearing comments, etc. |
Recommendation to B.O.T. on
9/20 |
Recommendation to B.O.T. on
9/20 |
106 |
|
|
|
Development Agreement; signed by Applicant prior to Board Hearing. |
9/20 (start; based on PC
recomm.) |
Assume 3-weeks to complete
development agreement & have it signed. |
9/20 (start) |
10/11 (finish) |
127 |
|
|
(continued)
|
13. Board of Trustees Public Hearing Notice to Newspaper |
fax notice by 9/29 |
15-day advance notice
required. |
Publish 10/5 |
Publish 10/5 |
121 (notice published prior to
Attorney completion of Development Agreement) |
|
14. Board of Trustees Public Hearing Notice to Property Owners within 500’ and on-property (responsibility of applicant except Staff prepares documents.) |
Provide notice to applicant
by 10/4 |
15-day advance notice
required. |
Notice Posted/Received by
10/6 |
Notice Posted/Received by
10/6 |
122 (notice posted received
prior to Attorney completion of Development Agreement.) |
|
15. Board of Trustees Public Hearing |
10/24 |
Not indicated, but
scheduling of Board of Trustee hearing dependent on their agenda load. |
10/24 |
10/24 |
140 |
|
16. Board of Trustees Decision/Ordinance |
11/14 |
B.O.T. Ordinance will rarely
if ever come on first reading; matrix presumes passage at meeting after
public hearing. |
11/14 |
11/14 |
161-days 5.3 months 23-weeks |
NOTES TO MINOR DEVELOPMENT PROCESS CHART:
1. The 161-days indicated for the ‘sample’ Minor Development assumes that the process operates like ‘clockwork’. Development projects rarely work like ‘clockwork’, and any number of variables can throw the time period off. Causes for delay, often outside the control of the reviewing authority, are common. Also note that additional time will be needed for any projects demanding special studies, etc.
2. The Table provides a time-frame for subdivision of land as ‘Minor Development’ (smaller subdivision.) It does not account for additional review time that will be necessary if structures are associated with the Minor Subdivision (see Site Plan review process.) The two processes (Minor Subdivision and Site Plan) can be processed concurrently,
however, applicants should generally anticipate additional review time.
3. Mechanisms to abbreviate the Minor Development process, for example, pre-anticipation of a Board of Trustee public hearing date when the Planning Commission has not a public hearing, nor reviewed and prepared a recommendation on the Minor Subdivision, are not typically recommended. Unless a Minor Development is ‘simple and straightforward’ in nature, the Planning Commission should be provided adequate time for a public hearing, and subsequent review and recommendation, before a Board of Trustee hearing date is fixed.